Microsoft Developing Microsoft SharePoint Server 2013 Core Solutions (70-488) Practice Exam

About 97% of what I saw on the real 70-488 lined up with topics I’d practiced. Felt fair, not spooky.

Passed with a comfortable margin. I wouldn’t skip the harder items — those taught the most.

Mobile-friendly enough for lunch breaks. Those small sessions added up more than I expected.

Coworker recommended this after he passed. Same story for me: coverage felt aligned with what showed up on test day.

Helped a lot with pattern recognition. Volume was fine for me; advanced scenarios could go deeper.

I tracked domains in a spreadsheet while practicing. Once every column was green, I booked the test.

I paired this with the vendor docs for anything I didn’t fully understand. Combo worked — first-attempt pass.

Used full-length timed sessions twice. Time management was my issue; those drills fixed it before 70-488.

Felt realistic without claiming to be a brain dump. That’s the balance I look for in prep tools.

Recommended it in our study Slack. Three of us sat 70-488 this quarter; all passed after using this set.

Explanations helped me correct misconceptions I’d carried from on-the-job shortcuts. Worth the price for that alone.

Bought access, finished ~70% of the bank, then focused on misses. That was my whole study plan.

Explanations are concise — not essay-length walls of text. Easy to revise on a commute.

Not flashy, just solid practice. Instant feedback made it easy to fix weak domains before exam day.

Got me through on the first attempt. Four stars only because a handful of explanations felt thinner than the rest.

Quietly effective. No hype in the product, which oddly made me trust the material more.

Clean UI, no junk ads, questions that actually teach. Used it alongside the official outline and that was enough.

Did one domain at a time until accuracy stayed above ~80%, then mixed sets. Passed Developing Microsoft SharePoint Server 2….

Bought this mainly for the explanations. Memorizing letters never worked for me; understanding the tradeoffs did.

Short review: good questions, better explanations, passed 70-488. Moving on to the next cert next quarter.

Passed yesterday. The “same questions” feel people mention is more about patterns than literal copies — still very helpful.

Cleared 70-488. Good explanations overall — a small number were vague about why the distractor failed.

I study better with concrete items than with slide decks. This bank matched how I learn.

I came from a non-traditional background. Structured practice here made the exam feel learnable.

Used this bank after work for two weeks. Timed a few full runs, reviewed misses, and walked into the real exam less shaky than my last cert.

Used this during a busy on-call rotation — 20 questions when I could. Still cleared 70-488.

Scored lower on early practice runs than I liked. Kept going; the curve bent up before exam week.

Solid value. I supplemented with the official whitepapers for two weak areas and that filled the gaps.

Passed 70-488 after using this as my primary drill set. Official docs for gaps, practice for fluency.

Used this as my primary bank and cleared the exam. UI is simple (good), question count could be higher for heavy topics.

Clearer than the free PDFs floating around. Explanations actually cite the reasoning instead of just restating the answer.

Short sessions beat marathon cramming for me. I did 25–40 questions a night and finished the bank before booking the exam.

Passed. Tell a friend who’s stuck in tutorial hell to switch to practice questions sooner.

Passed 70-488. If you’re already familiar with the domain, this is enough volume to get exam-ready without fluff.

I’m usually skeptical of “exam dumps.” This felt more like guided practice. Cleared 70-488 last month.

Used the bookmark feature heavily. My “wrong twice” list became the only thing I studied the final two days.

Four stars: strong overlap with real exam style, minor wish-list for more cost/architecture tradeoff scenarios.

Useful main drill set. I’d add more timed full-length mocks, but the question quality is solid.

The overlap people talk about felt real for me — roughly in the 97% ballpark on topics and framing.

If you’ve read the official guide once, jump straight into this bank. That’s the loop that worked for me.

I compared a few providers; this one had fewer typos and better distractors. That decided it for me.

Not every question is perfect, but the set as a whole prepared me well. First-try pass.